Analisis Likuefaksi Berdasarkan Data CPT Untuk Perancangan Pondasi Di Pesisir Pantai Kabupaten Kulon Progo DIY

Vebrian Anggara(1), Ferry Fatnanta(2*), Muhamad Yusa(3)

(1) Prodi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau
(2) Prodi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau
(3) Prodi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/jrs.16.2.77-90.2020

Copyright (c) 2020 Vebrian Anggara, Ferry Fatnanta Muhamad Yusa

Abstract


Yogyakarta Special Region (DIY) is an area that has a high level of seismic activity in Indonesia. This is due to various local faults near the land and its location adjacent to the subduction of the Indo-Australian and Eurasian plates. The proposed new airport is located on the coast in Kulon Progo Regency DIY. The location is dominated by the sands layer and it has high ground water levels which indicate the high potential of liquefaction. The site classes of the coast in Kulon Progo Regency is medium category (SD). Liquefaction analysis using the PGAM value of 0.4 g. Liquefaction has the potential to occur in soil layers 0 - 6 meters. The analysis shows for eartquake of ≥ 6.3 Mw has a very high category of liquefaction. The analysis results has LPI ≥ 29.30 for ground water conditions at the surface, and LPI ≥ 15.32 for ground water conditions in depths of 3 meters. Estimated soil settlements of 19.7 cm for magnitude of 8.1 Mw with ground water conditions at the surface. The use of shallow foundations at soil depths of 0-6 meters is not recommended, unless a soil improvement method is used to eliminate the potential for liquefaction.

Keywords


liquefaction; LPI; magnitude; settlements

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Correlating The Shear Wave Velocity With The Cone Penetration Test. doi:https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre17.155

Boulanger, R. W., & Idriss, I. M. (2014). CPT And SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures.

Dixit, J. e. a. (2012). Assessment Of Liquefaction Potential Index For Mumbai City. 2759–2768. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2759-2012

Iwasaki, e. a. (1978). A Practical Method For Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential Based On Case Studies At Various Sites In Japan. Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation, San Francisco, 885−896.

Luna, R., & Frost, J. D. (1998). Spatial Liquefaction Analysis System. J. Comput. Civil Eng, 12, 48-56.

Meisina, C. e. a. (2017). Differences Between Mechanical And Electrical Cone Penetration Test In The Liquefaction Hazard Assessment And Soil Profile Reconstruction.

Meyerhof, G. G. (1956). Penetration Test And Bearing Capacity Of Cohesionless Soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 82(1), 1-19.

Nasional, B. S. (2008). Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Jembatan.

Nasional, B. S. (2012). Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung Dan Non Gedung.

Robertson, P. K., & Cabal, K. L. (2010). Estimating Soil Unit Weight From CPT.

Wair, e. a. (2012). Guidelines For Estimation Of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles. Pacific Earthq. Eng, 8, 68.

Zhang, e. a. (2002). Estimating Liquefaction-induced Ground Settlements From CPT For Level Ground. 1168-1180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/T02-047




Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil (JRS)-Universitas Andalas (Unand). ISSN: 1858-2133 (print) & 2477-3484 (online)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License